The value hike isn’t the issue. It by no means was.
When Spotify introduced Premium would bounce to $12.99 in February 2026, the headlines centered on subscribers paying an additional greenback month-to-month.
What they missed was the sleight of hand occurring beneath: a Fundamental tier intentionally obscured via darkish patterns, an AI content material flood diluting royalty swimming pools, and a management transition that positions the platform even deeper into artificial audio territory.
The actual story isn’t about what subscribers can pay. It’s about what artists received’t obtain.
The Hidden Tier You’re Not Presupposed to Discover
Spotify nonetheless affords a Fundamental music-only subscription at $10.99 month-to-month. You received’t discover it simply.
The corporate makes use of comparability prevention, obstruction, and sneaking to bury its existence so totally that over 99% of subscribers by no means encounter it.
Strive looking out Spotify’s pricing web page. Fundamental doesn’t seem. Examine the app’s subscription choices. Nothing.
The tier exists solely for “eligible” Premium subscribers at Spotify’s discretion, and solely current Premium members can downgrade. New subscribers? Locked out fully.
Digital Music Information recognized the darkish patterns at work:
Comparability prevention combines options and costs in intentionally advanced preparations, making side-by-side analysis practically inconceivable.
Obstruction locations boundaries between customers and their targets, requiring a number of steps the place one ought to suffice.
Sneaking hides choices that may value the corporate income while prominently displaying costlier options.
This issues past client rights. The Fundamental tier serves a authorized operate. When Spotify bundled audiobooks into Premium subscriptions in late 2023, it reclassified these tiers underneath Phonorecords IV agreements, slashing mechanical royalties to publishers and songwriters.
Standalone music subscriptions like Fundamental pay the complete 15.35% charge. Bundled plans? About 24.5% of whole content material value.
Conserving Fundamental technically out there lets Spotify declare a non-bundled possibility exists while making certain virtually no person truly makes use of it.
The Mechanical Licensing Collective sued over this bundling technique. The case continues.
In the meantime, subscribers who do discover Fundamental and subsequently cancel can by no means resubscribe. That’s the language usually reserved for grandfathered plans being phased out.
The Management Change No person’s Discussing Correctly
Daniel Ek stepped down as CEO on 1 January 2026, transitioning to Government Chairman. Co-presidents Gustav Söderström and Alex Norström now deal with day-to-day operations. The press launch framed it as strategic evolution. The timing tells a unique story.
Ek’s departure caps months of artist boycotts over his funding in Helsing, a German defence know-how firm creating AI-powered army drones.
By way of his funding firm Prima Materia, Ek poured practically $700 million into Helsing in 2025 alone, serving as the corporate’s chairman.
Artists together with Hotline TNT, Deerhoof, and Xiu Xiu eliminated their catalogues from Spotify in protest.
The motion by no means reached Taylor Swift proportions, but it surely uncovered one thing extra regarding: most boycotting artists stay signed to labels controlling their masters, that means their again catalogues stayed on Spotify regardless. They might solely withhold future releases.
King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard left Spotify in July 2025. Inside months, AI-generated clones appeared underneath names like “King Lizard Wizard”, actively promoted by Spotify’s personal suggestion algorithm. The theoretical grew to become terrifyingly actual.
Ek’s “stepping apart” removes the lightning rod while altering nothing about Spotify’s elementary trajectory. He retains enter and oversight.
The brand new co-CEOs have spent their whole careers at Spotify, steeped in its tradition and priorities. When you anticipated a philosophical shift, the appointment of inside successors ought to recalibrate these expectations.
The AI Flood No person Can Precisely Rely
Deezer’s analysis scientist estimated one-third of the 100,000 tracks uploaded each day are AI-generated.
That’s 33,000 artificial songs coming into streaming platforms each single day. Spotify hasn’t disputed these figures publicly.
Suno generates roughly 7 million AI tracks each day. Deezer experiences 50,000 new AI tracks hitting its platform.
Given Spotify’s market dominance, conservative estimates counsel 100,000 AI-generated tracks land on Spotify each day.
All of them draw from the identical royalty pool as human creators.
Spotify’s head of artist and trade partnerships Bryan Johnson claims “infinitely small consumption of absolutely AI-generated tracks” means “no dilution of the royalty pool.”
The maths doesn’t assist that assertion if you’re including hundreds of thousands of AI tracks month-to-month to a streamshare mannequin the place each play shifts the proportion distribution.
Right here’s how streamshare works: your royalties rely in your share of whole platform streams in a given interval.
If 100,000 AI tracks every generate 50 streams month-to-month (a low estimate), that’s 5 million streams redirected away from human artists. Each month. Compounding.
The primary AI-powered artist to chart on Billboard arrived in November 2025. Xania Monet’s monitor topped the R&B Digital Tune Gross sales chart, amassing 44.4 million streams and producing over $52,000.
In September, Monet secured a $3 million recording contract after what Billboard described as a “bidding conflict”. Most AI artists don’t disclose their artificial nature in platform descriptions.
AI-generated artist Blow Data earned an estimated £123,176 from 2025 releases alone, regardless of solely launching in June.
Their monitor “Predador de Perereca” went viral on TikTok with 1.6 million video makes use of. They’ve amassed over 45 million streams and a couple of.8 million common month-to-month listeners.
For context, that’s extra month-to-month listeners than established acts like Rizzle Kicks. Understanding how you can maximise your streaming income turns into much more important when competing towards this AI flood.
The Knowledge Breach Spotify Can’t Undo
In December 2025, Anna’s Archive scraped metadata for 256 million audio tracks and 86 million music recordsdata from Spotify. They bragged about it publicly, distributing 300 terabytes by way of bulk torrents.
Spotify partnered with main labels to sue Anna’s Archive in the US District Court docket for the Southern District of New York.
The grievance alleges Anna’s Archive circumvented Spotify’s technological measures utilizing 1000’s of accounts to obtain recordsdata they’d no authorized proper to entry.
This issues for 2 causes past the instant copyright violation:
First, that scraped knowledge turns into coaching materials for generative AI fashions. The lawsuit alleges particular DMCA violations round breaking technological boundaries, however the toothpaste is out of the tube.
These 86 million audio recordsdata at the moment are floating within the digital ether, out there to anybody working AI coaching pipelines.
Second, it exposes how susceptible streaming platforms stay to systematic knowledge extraction.
If Anna’s Archive may scrape a quarter-billion monitor metadata data, what stops industrial AI firms with considerably extra assets? The reply seems to be: not a lot.
Spotify introduced it eliminated over 75 million “spammy tracks” previously 12 months. That’s encouraging till you notice they’re taking part in whack-a-mole towards opponents who can generate content material sooner than any human moderation crew can evaluate it.
What Spotify’s AI Partnerships Truly Imply
In October 2025, Spotify introduced collaborations with Sony Music Group, Common Music Group, Warner Music Group, Merlin, and Imagine to develop “artist-first AI music merchandise”. The press launch emphasised 4 rules:
- Partnerships with rightsholders
- Alternative in participation
- Truthful compensation and new income
- Artist-fan connection
Learn previous the company language and the image clarifies. Spotify is licensing catalogues from main labels to coach AI fashions that may generate new income streams.
Artists and rightsholders can select whether or not to take part. Those that decide in obtain compensation via “upfront agreements” quite than “asking for forgiveness later”.
Goldman Sachs estimated superfan monetization may generate $4.3 billion in annual income by 2026.
Spotify’s AI instruments seem designed to unlock that income by creating interactive options interesting to listeners prepared to pay premium costs for enhanced engagement.
The “prompted playlist” function rolled out January 2026 exemplifies this path.
Premium subscribers within the US and Canada can now generate playlists from textual content prompts reflecting “vibes, emotions or recollections”.
The AI creates customized mixes that may refresh each day or weekly, with descriptions explaining every track suggestion.
It makes use of generative AI educated on… effectively, Spotify hasn’t disclosed the coaching knowledge specifics, however given their partnerships with main labels and the timing of those bulletins, educated guesses develop into simple.
Right here’s the uncomfortable query: if Spotify can generate playlists that really feel personally curated, how lengthy earlier than it might generate the precise songs filling these playlists?
The know-how already exists. The licensing frameworks are being negotiated. The income incentive is gigantic.
Spotify pays royalties on human-created music. It wouldn’t pay royalties on platform-generated content material.
The Income Actuality Unbiased Artists Face
The value enhance generates an estimated $978 million in extra annual income.
None of that flows on to artists. It goes to Spotify, which then distributes royalties by way of streamshare calculations after taking its lower. Spotify’s path to profitability depends on these incremental value will increase while controlling prices.
Utilizing Spotify’s personal 2024 knowledge, an artist receiving one in each 1,000,000 streams generated roughly $10,000.
That’s a median end result underneath streamshare, not a set per-stream charge. The April 2024 eligibility rule requires tracks to hit 1,000 streams within the earlier 12 months to earn recorded-royalty payouts.
When you’re an unbiased artist competing towards AI-generated content material that prices nothing to provide and may be uploaded in limitless portions, the maths turns into grim shortly.
Premium subscribers generate 3-4 occasions extra income per stream than free tier listeners.
The value hike may truly profit artists if it doesn’t set off subscriber churn. However that assumes the extra income will get distributed by way of streamshare to human creators quite than absorbed by platform prices or redirected to AI-generated content material that Spotify doubtlessly owns.
The bundling challenge compounds this. With 99% of US subscriptions now bundled, most artists obtain considerably lowered mechanical royalties in comparison with standalone music subscriptions. The Fundamental tier theoretically addresses this, however Spotify’s darkish patterns guarantee virtually no person can entry it.
Understanding which songs truly generate billions of streams reveals the size required to make streaming work as main earnings.
What Artists Can Truly Do
Deal with streaming platforms as promoting, not earnings. This isn’t defeatism; it’s strategic readability. Spotify affords distribution and discovery.
It doesn’t supply sustainable artist income at any significant scale except you’re pulling hundreds of thousands of streams month-to-month.
Construct direct relationships with listeners via e mail lists, Patreon, Bandcamp, or owned platforms.
Each subscriber who pays you $5 month-to-month instantly generates extra income than 1000’s of Spotify streams while eradicating platform intermediaries.
Acquire each royalty stream you’re owed. Most unbiased artists declare solely grasp recording royalties via distributors.
Efficiency royalties stream via PROs (PRS for Music within the UK, ASCAP or BMI within the US).
Mechanical royalties require separate assortment via publishers or admin companies like Songtrust. YouTube generates direct licensing royalties many artists by no means declare.
Perceive the 1,000-stream threshold. Tracks producing fewer than 1,000 streams over 12 months don’t qualify for recorded-royalty payouts underneath Spotify’s present mannequin.
Meaning your first precedence is hitting that minimal threshold persistently quite than chasing viral moments.
Launch strategically quite than often for frequency’s sake. Spotify’s algorithm rewards constant engagement, however throwing tracks into the void hoping one sticks wastes assets.
Deal with high quality releases each 6-8 weeks with correct pre-release pitching to playlist editors via Spotify for Artists at the least 7 days earlier than launch.
Diversify income streams aggressively. Stay efficiency, merchandise, sync licensing, instructing, session work, manufacturing for different artists. A number of earnings sources create stability that streaming alone can’t present.
Doc all the things. Monitor which releases carry out finest, analyze listener demographics, monitor the place engagement occurs, and research the patterns. Understanding chart actions reveals what works to your particular scenario higher than generic recommendation.
The Uncomfortable Reality About Sustainability
Eire’s three-year pilot programme paying 2,000 musicians a primary wage produced outstanding outcomes.
Artists stop part-time jobs, psychological well being improved, inventive output elevated, and cultural contributions grew to become measurable. The programme grew to become everlasting in 2026 based mostly on these outcomes.
The Residing Wage for Musicians Act stays in legislative pipelines. If handed, it may create new royalty constructions requiring platforms like Spotify to pay minimal charges no matter streamshare arithmetic.
These options acknowledge what the music trade retains making an attempt to keep away from: streaming royalties alone can’t maintain the overwhelming majority of working musicians.
The maths doesn’t work. It by no means did. Including AI-generated content material to the royalty pool equation makes sustainability even much less achievable.
The selection going through artists isn’t whether or not to make use of Spotify. It’s whether or not to mistake Spotify for a profession quite than recognizing it as one instrument amongst many. The platform serves discovery and accessibility.
It can’t function your main income supply except you’ve already achieved scale that makes you much less susceptible to those systemic points.
Spotify’s value enhance, management transition, and AI partnerships reveal an organization optimizing for profitability and shareholder worth.
That’s not an ethical failing; it’s what publicly traded firms do. However artists want to grasp the sport being performed quite than anticipating platforms to prioritize inventive sustainability over monetary returns.
The 1,000-stream threshold exists as a result of Spotify decided that processing micro-payments for tracks producing minimal streams value greater than these streams generated in income.
The bundling technique exists as a result of it improves Spotify’s negotiating place with rights holders while decreasing mechanical royalty obligations.
The darkish patterns hiding Fundamental tier exist as a result of driving subscribers towards higher-priced choices will increase income.
None of this serves artists. It serves Spotify.
Recognition of that actuality ought to inform each strategic choice you make about the place to take a position time, power, and assets in constructing a music profession that truly sustains you.
Key Takeaways for Artists
Value Enhance Particulars:
- Spotify Premium rises to $12.99/month (US) from February 2026
- Beforehand $11.99/month (elevated from $10.99 in June 2025)
- Estimated to generate $978 million extra annual income
- No direct profit to artists; income distributed by way of current streamshare mannequin
Fundamental Tier Entry:
- Music-only subscription at $10.99/month technically nonetheless exists
- Intentionally hidden via darkish sample design
- Solely “eligible” current Premium subscribers can downgrade
- New subscribers can’t entry Fundamental tier in any respect
- As soon as cancelled, can’t be resubscribed
- Exists primarily to counter bundling lawsuit claims
AI Music Scale:
- Roughly 100,000 AI-generated tracks uploaded to Spotify each day
- One-third of all each day uploads are AI-generated (Deezer analysis)
- All AI tracks draw from identical royalty pool as human creators
- First AI artist (Xania Monet) charted on Billboard in November 2025
- AI artist Blow Data earned estimated £123,176 from 2025 releases alone
Royalty Assortment Guidelines:
- Grasp recording royalties (by way of distributor like DistroKid, CD Child, or TuneCore)
- Efficiency royalties (PRS for Music UK / ASCAP or BMI US)
- Mechanical royalties (requires writer or admin service like Songtrust)
- Direct licensing royalties (YouTube, sync, and so on.)
- Neighbouring rights (session musicians, featured artists)
- Full income assortment information
Streaming Threshold Necessities:
- Minimal 1,000 streams per monitor in 12 months to qualify for payouts
- 30 seconds of playback counts as one stream
- Premium subscribers generate 3-4x extra income per stream than free customers
- Streamshare mannequin means your share of whole platform streams determines payout
Income Actuality:
- One in each 1,000,000 streams generated roughly $10,000 in 2024 (Spotify knowledge)
- Unbiased artists usually obtain $3-5 per 1,000 streams to grasp rightsholder
- After distributor charges and splits, precise artist fee varies considerably
- Bundled subscriptions pay lowered mechanical royalties (52% income base vs. full charge)
Need to survive the streaming financial system? Subscribe to Neon Music for evaluation that cuts via trade spin and offers you actionable intelligence.
You may also like:
