A controversial tax modification tucked into the Senate-passed model of President Donald Trump’s sweeping “One Large Stunning Invoice Act” (OBBBA) is drawing sharp criticism from gamblers, lawmakers, and gaming trade stakeholders. If accredited by the Home and signed into legislation, the change might upend the monetary viability {of professional} playing in the USA.
Beneath the revised tax code language, gamblers would solely be capable to deduct 90% of their losses towards their winnings beginning in 2026. The present legislation permits gamers to totally offset their playing losses, offered they don’t exceed their winnings. This alteration could pressure gamblers to pay taxes even after they break even, or worse, after they lose cash total.
As an illustration, somebody who wins and loses $100,000 in the identical tax yr can be taxed as if they’d made $10,000 in revenue, regardless of netting nothing. The implications are significantly extreme for professionals who wager giant sums, typically with slim margins between wins and losses.
Business Specialists and Gamers Warn of “Phantom Taxation”
Distinguished skilled poker participant Phil Galfond, identified each for his winnings and his advocacy inside the gaming world, expressed grave issues concerning the modification in a video posted to X. “Now, we might pay as if we gained $5.2 million, minus 90 % of $5 million, which is $4.5 million for a faux internet of $700,000… So you’d make $200,000 throughout the yr and pay tax as in the event you made $700,000,” Galfond defined, highlighting what he known as “phantom” earnings that don’t exist in actuality.
Galfond emphasised that the brand new rule wouldn’t simply impression high-rollers, in keeping with Newsweek. Informal gamers and gaming operators would additionally really feel the results, as professionals play a crucial function in sustaining aggressive ecosystems throughout poker, sports activities betting, and each day fantasy sports activities.
“That is actually dangerous. Whether or not you’re a poker participant, [Daily fantasy sports] participant, a sports activities higher, any type of gambler – skilled or leisure – however particularly skilled. And even if you’re operator in one in all these areas. It’s fairly scary,” Galfond stated.
Lawmakers and Stakeholders Push Again on Tax Provision
Opposition isn’t restricted to the playing group. Democratic Consultant Dina Titus of Nevada, a state closely reliant on the gaming trade, decried the supply. “It pushes individuals into the black market in the event that they don’t do regulated gaming as a result of they’ve a tax drawback, and the black market doesn’t pay taxes, isn’t regulated, doesn’t assist with drawback gaming,” Titus warned. “So it’s dangerous for the trade in addition to for the participant.”
Titus has pledged to struggle the supply, vowing to introduce standalone laws if the measure isn’t stripped throughout the Home’s ultimate consideration of the invoice. She described the addition as “including insult to harm” for her constituents, noting the broader invoice already rolls again healthcare, renewable vitality initiatives, and scholar support.
Doug Polk, one other high-profile poker skilled, took his objections on to Texas Consultant Chip Roy. “Chip, I’m in your district. There’s a provision within the Senate model that may kill skilled playing. This can negatively impression THOUSANDS of Texans,” Polk wrote in a submit on X, urging Roy to advocate for the modification’s elimination.
A Crushing Blow for the Playing Economic system?
Maria Konnikova, a poker-playing creator, echoed the sentiment. “It’s mainly an enormous in-built price on selecting to interact in any type of playing… As an alternative of an earnings stream, poker turns into a legal responsibility,” she stated. Konnikova famous that even when she nets zero earnings after a yr of tournaments, she would now face taxes on $10,000 she by no means truly earned. “That is completely bonkers.”
Skilled gamblers, who typically function on skinny revenue margins over lengthy stretches of volatility, warn that the change might wipe out their complete career. One nameless participant stated that even a $1 million internet acquire after $99 million in losses might result in being taxed on an inflated earnings determine, leading to a monetary lack of $2 million after taxes.
Joshua Horowitz, a CPA who specializes within the skilled sports activities trade, likened the measure to restrictions on enterprise internet working losses, however with extra punishing implications for gamblers. “They’re limiting your losses to 90%, which can trigger individuals to owe tax even in years that they’ve internet losses,” he stated.
In keeping with the Joint Committee on Taxation, the gambling-related provision is projected to generate over $1.1 billion in federal income over eight years, roughly $137.5 million per yr.
Playing Business Faces Unsure Future as Home Considers Closing Vote
The Senate narrowly handed the OBBBA by a 51-50 margin on Tuesday, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. The Home should now vote once more on the Senate-amended invoice. Its earlier model, accredited in Could, didn’t comprise the playing provision. If the present model is handed by the Home and signed by President Trump, the adjustments to playing loss deductions would take impact in 2026.
Trump has urged Congress to ship the laws to his desk by July 4, however acknowledged on Tuesday that hitting the deadline could show “very arduous.”
With no public rationalization as to who advocated for the supply’s inclusion, the playing group, together with involved lawmakers, are scrambling to strip it from the ultimate invoice earlier than it turns into legislation.
